Interscale Content Hub – In recent years, the debate on two factor authentication vs multi factor authentication has been a big topic in the digital security landscape.
With the rise in cyber threats, robust authentication methods are key to protecting sensitive information. Verifying a user’s identity is a big part of keeping your digital security tight.
Two-factor authentication means you need two different ways to prove who you are, whereas multi-factor authentication uses two or more different methods to verify your identity.
So, it’s time to compare 2FA and MFA.
Why Use Authentication Methods?
Authentication is basically the gatekeeper to our digital identities. It verifies that we are who we say we are. It’s the first line of defense against unauthorized access, protecting sensitive information and preventing fraud.
Without authentication, malicious actors could access our online accounts, financial transactions, and personal data.
Over the past decade, cyberattacks have become more and more sophisticated, which is why strong authentication is more important than ever. Strong authentication measures help reduce these risks.
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is a great way to keep your accounts safe even if someone gets hold of your login details. It’s a really important part of modern cybersecurity strategies.
You might want to read “The Multi Factor Authentication Office 365 Playbook Hackers Hate,” for your Office 365 MFA reference.
What is Two-Factor Authentication?
Two-factor authentication (2FA) is a way to make traditional password-based login systems more secure by requiring an extra step to verify your identity. This method combines something the user knows, like a password, with something the user has, like a mobile device or hardware token.
Some common 2FA methods are hardware tokens, which generate a code for login, and SMS or voice codes, sent to the user’s phone.
Software tokens, like Google Authenticator, create time-based one-time passcodes, while push notifications send an approval request to the user’s device.
Biometrics, like fingerprint or facial recognition, add another layer of security by verifying the user’s identity through unique biological traits.
Using 2FA makes it much harder for attackers to gain access because they would need both the password and the second authentication factor.
What is Multi-Factor Authentication?
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) builds on the idea of 2FA by requiring two or more verification methods from different categories.
There are three main categories: knowledge, possession, and inherence. Knowledge is something the user knows, like a password. Possession is something the user has, like a smartphone. Inherence is something inherent to the user, like biometric data.
For example, a user might log in with a password, get a push notification on their phone, and then scan their fingerprint.
This multi-layered security approach really boosts security by requiring multiple forms of verification, making it much harder for people to access your account without your permission.
Jumpcloud says in their article “Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Trends to Know in 2024” that MFA is pretty common in larger companies. 87% of firms with over 10,000 employees use MFA, which shows how important it is for keeping things secure.
What’s the Difference Between 2FA and MFA?
The major difference between 2FA vs MFA is the number and type of authentication factors used. Two-factor authentication (2FA) cross-authenticates using two factors, while Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) involves using at least two factors or more and usually includes a biometric factor.
Beyond the technical, let’s look at the difference in more detail.
Benefits 2FA and MFA
The benefits of 2FA include simplicity, low-cost implementation, and immediate security enhancement. It’s effective in deterring phishing attacks and brute-force attempts by requiring two independent forms of proof. For example, using a password with a time-based one-time password (TOTP) can block bulk phishing attacks effectively.
MFA, however, extends these benefits by incorporating additional layers. This added security is critical for mitigating risks in high-value environments.
For example, a study found that dedicated MFA apps like Microsoft Authenticator had a lower failure rate (1.44% total) compared to SMS (1.66%). On the other hand, Microsoft found that more than 99.9% of compromised accounts don’t have MFA, which leaves them vulnerable to password spray, phishing, and password reuse.
Examples of 2FA vs MFA
A standard example of a 2FA setup is a password (knowledge) combined with an SMS code (possession). This method effectively balances user experience with security for applications like email or social media.
On the flip side, MFA setups combine a password (knowledge) with biometric verification, like fingerprint recognition (inherence), and an OTP generated by an app (possession). This setup is commonly used in financial institutions, where a single vulnerability could lead to significant losses.
As MFA adoption grows, a trend emerges towards biometrics and app-generated OTPs over SMS, offering both increased reliability and reduced vulnerability to interception. This shift is critical for enterprises prioritizing the safeguarding of sensitive data.
Security Level
The security level of 2FA is moderate, as it relies on two distinct factors, typically a password and a second layer such as an SMS or app-generated code. This combination provides protection against common threats like password phishing. However, vulnerabilities like SIM-swapping and intercepted codes reduce their effectiveness against sophisticated attackers.
MFA, on the other hand, offers a higher security level by integrating additional factors, such as biometrics or device-based tokens. For instance, combining a password, fingerprint, and app-based OTP strengthens resistance against unauthorized access.
Microsoft reports indicate MFA reduces account compromises by 99.9%, even in cases of leaked credentials. These added layers make it significantly harder for attackers to bypass all security measures simultaneously.
As threats evolve, the gap between the security provided by 2FA and MFA widens. MFA’s dynamic adaptability to risks, such as requiring specific authentication methods based on user behavior or location, makes it a preferred choice for critical environments. While 2FA suffices for general online activities, MFA is essential where the stakes are higher, such as protecting financial or healthcare systems.
Use Cases Two Factor Authentication vs Multi Factor Authentication
The use cases for 2FA are generally focused on individual accounts and low-to-moderate risk applications. Examples include securing personal email or social media accounts. Therefore, 2FA adoption is widespread.
Typically, organizations implement 2FA for less sensitive systems, reflecting its ease of deployment and user acceptance. It effectively balances convenience with security in scenarios where the primary goal is to deter casual threats.
MFA, in contrast, is there for enterprises and high-risk systems. MFA is extensively used in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where regulatory compliance and data protection are critical.
Jumpcloud reports that 87% of large organizations (10,000+ employees) have implemented MFA to safeguard sensitive information. Use cases include securing access to enterprise networks, cloud platforms, and confidential databases.
As remote work and digital transformation expand, MFA’s ability to counteract advanced threats is driving adoption across sectors. High-risk environments increasingly incorporate adaptive MFA, which dynamically adjusts the authentication method based on risk signals such as location or device reputation.
Cost and Complexity
The cost and complexity of 2FA are significantly lower than those of MFA, making it a practical choice for small businesses and individual users. Implementation often involves minimal infrastructure changes, relying on widely accessible methods like SMS-based codes or app-generated OTPs.
In contrast, MFA, while more robust, involves higher complexity due to the integration of multiple authentication factors such as biometrics, tokens, or adaptive systems. For example, deploying MFA with biometric authentication may require specialized hardware and software, increasing upfront costs. So, organizations using MFA have more IT security budgets to manage their deployment and ongoing maintenance.
The disparity in complexity extends to user experience. 2FA is easier for users to adopt, with simple setups that do not require additional devices or training. MFA, though more secure, can introduce friction in workflows, particularly in enterprises managing large-scale rollouts.
Adaptive MFA solutions, which adjust authentication requirements based on user behavior or location, aim to balance security with usability but add layers of operational complexity.
If you’re looking for more info on the perfect mix of multi-factor authentication for your business, kindly read “Find the Perfect Types of Multi Factor Authentication Mix for Your Business.”
So, Is 2FA or MFA More Secure?
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is generally more secure than two-factor authentication (2FA) because it involves multiple verification factors. This multi-layered approach makes it harder for hackers to get around all the security measures.
As Jumpcloud says in “Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Trends to Know in 2024,” big companies with over 10,000 employees have an 87% adoption rate for MFA because they know it’s better for security.
The Okta Inc. white paper says MFA systems have to be designed carefully to manage account recovery vulnerabilities and protect against brute force attacks.
By ensuring that the recovery flow for the second factor is separate from the primary factor and involving administrators in high-assurance authentication scenarios, MFA can provide a higher level of security than 2FA.
Sebastian Florczak’s research backs up what we’ve been discussing about MFA being better than 2FA. It goes into detail about the different methods and how secure they are. They say that while 2FA methods like SMS codes and mobile apps are pretty effective, they can be vulnerable to interception and phishing.
MFA methods, especially those involving hardware tokens and biometric verification, offer a stronger protection against these attacks.
J.K. Mohsin’s full review of authentication methods in mobile cloud computing environments shows that MFA’s multiple layers of security make it the best choice for protecting sensitive data. They say 2FA is better than single-factor authentication, but MFA is even better because it’s more secure and protects against sophisticated cyber threats.
How Interscale Can Be Your Backing in Cybersecurity
At Interscale, we offer solutions for managing your cybersecurity, including the implementation of 2FA and MFA. By combining these authentication methods, we make your company’s security protocols stronger and reduce the risk of unauthorized access.
Our work with Davey Water Products shows how our security solutions work in real-world scenarios.
If you’re interested in learning more about how Interscale can help you with your cybersecurity needs, check out our Managed Cybersecurity Services page. Or, if you need more details or have any adjustment, we’re here for you 24/7. If you’re interested in setting up a one-on-one discussion, just let us know.
Managed Cybersecurity Services in Australia
Contact us today to learn more!
Conclusion
Both two-factor authentication (2FA) and multi-factor authentication (MFA) are pretty essential tools in today’s cybersecurity landscape. It’s best for your company to think carefully about what kind of security you really need and how sensitive the data you handle is.
This assessment will help you figure out which authentication method is best for protecting your valuable information—whether it’s 2FA or MFA.
Ultimately, it comes down to finding the right balance between security and user convenience. This means weighing up two factor authentication vs multi factor authentication, while also keeping in mind the ever-changing threat landscape.
FAQ 2FA vs MFA
Is 2FA a Subset of MFA?
2FA is indeed a subset of MFA. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) refers to any authentication process that involves two or more independent factors, such as something you know, have, or are. 2FA specifically uses exactly two factors, making it the simplest form of MFA. For example, a password and an OTP represent 2FA, while adding a biometric makes it MFA.
Is Microsoft Authenticator 2FA or MFA?
Microsoft Authenticator supports both 2FA and MFA, depending on how it is configured. For personal accounts, it often functions as a 2FA tool by combining a password with an app-generated OTP. In enterprise environments, it integrates with Azure Active Directory to enable MFA setups with additional factors like biometrics or conditional access policies.
Is Google Authenticator 2FA or MFA?
Google Authenticator is primarily a 2FA tool. It generates time-based one-time passwords (TOTP) that complement a primary password, forming two authentication factors.
Should You Enable 2FA or MFA on Personal Accounts?
Enabling 2FA or MFA on personal accounts is highly recommended. 2FA offers sufficient protection for most users by securing accounts with a password and a second factor like an OTP. For sensitive data, such as financial or healthcare accounts, MFA provides enhanced protection by adding layers like biometrics or device-based authentication.
Do Small Businesses Need MFA?
Small businesses should adopt MFA to protect against rising cyber threats. While 2FA is a good starting point, MFA provides robust security for critical assets like customer data or financial systems.
